ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the current status of surgery for portal hypertension to grasp current status and future development of surgery in China.Methods:This study is jointly sponsored by China Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Specialist Alliance & Portal Hypertension Alliance in China (CHESS).Comprehensive surveying is conducted for basic domestic situations of surgery for portal hypertension, including case load, surgical approaches, management of postoperative complications, primary effects, existing confusion and obstacles, liver transplantation(LT), laparoscopic procedures and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS), etc.Results:A total of 8 512 cases of portal hypertension surgery are performed at 378 hospitals nationwide in 2021.Splenectomy plus devascularization predominated(53.0%)and laparoscopy accounted for 76.1%.Primary goal is preventing rebleeding(67.0%) and 72.8% of hospitals used preventive anticoagulants after conventional surgery.And 80.7% of teams believe that the formation of postoperative portal vein thrombosis is a surgical dilemma and 65.3% of hospitals practiced both laparoscopy and TIPS.The major reasons for patients with portal hypertension not receiving LT are due to a lack of qualifications for LT(69.3%)and economic factors(69.0%).Conclusions:Surgery is an integral part of management of portal hypertension in China.However, it is imperative to further standardize the grasp of surgical indications, the handling of surgical operation and the management of postoperative complications.Moreover, prospective, multi-center randomized controlled clinical studies should be performed.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the safety and efficacy on timing of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) stageⅡbased on increase in remnant liver volume.Methods:19 patients (male: female 13: 6; average age 53 years) with liver tumors treated by ALPPS from April 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively studied. Patients with FLV/ESLV (future liver volume/ estimated standard liver volume) increase of more than 50% within 1 week followed by stageⅡALPPS were included into the rapid group ( n=8). Those who failed to have 50% increase in FLV/ESLV within 1 week were included into the control group ( n=11). The two groups were compared in the ALPPS stage II in operating time, blood loss, postoperative complications, mortality rate and hospital stay. Results:All 19 patients underwent ALPPS stage II uneventfully. One patient in the control group died from liver failure within 30 days of operation. The operation time (3.2±1.8)h, blood loss (554±227) ml and postoperative hospital stay (12.6±2.4) d in the rapid group were significantly better than those in the control group (4.7±2.2) h, [(760±314) ml, (18.2±6.4) d (all P<0.05)]. The two groups had similar complication rates in both post stageⅠ[37.5%(3/8) vs. 45.4%(5/11)] , or stageⅡ [37.5%(3/8) vs. 36.4%(4/11)] (both P>0.05). Conclusion:Rapid increase in FLR volume of more than 50% within a week was safe and feasible to proceed to ALPPS stage II. This conclusion needs to be confirmed by further studies using large sample sizes.